The Myth of 2,2g/kg: Optimal Protein Intake for Bodybuilders

The Myth of 2,2g/kg: Optimal Protein Intake for Bodybuilders

The Myth of 2,2g/kg: Optimal Protein Intake for Bodybuilders

0 comments 📅10 July 2015, 12:57
22
Shares
Share with your friends










Submit

By Menno Henselmans ()

Protein. It’s every bodybuilder’s favorite macronutrient and for good reason. Protein is extremely essential, super satiating and amazingly anabolic. Protein is awesome… but you’re consuming too much of it.

Like most myths, the belief that you should take in 1g/lb of body weight has become so deeply entrenched in the fitness world that its validity is rarely questioned. Strangely, very few people think it’s a bit too accidental that the optimal amount of protein your body can assimilate in a day is exactly 1g/lb. 2.2g/kg doesn’t sound as right, does it? Of course, I know you read my articles for their scientific merit, so let’s look at the literature on the effects of daily protein intake to find out if 1g/lb really is the optimal amount of protein intake for maximum muscle gains.

The Myth of 2,2g/kg: Optimal Protein Intake for Bodybuilders

Studies on Optimal Protein Intake

All values in the bullet point list below are expressed as grams of protein per pound of body weight per day. All of these studies controlled for energy intake, either based on individual requirements or by setting energy intake to be equal in all experimental conditions, so that only the proportion of protein in the diet varied between groups. If the studies were based on unreliable methods such as nitrogen balance, a marker of lean body mass changes, I only included them if they controlled for sweating and dietary adaptation periods.

  • Tarnopolsky et al. (1992) observed no differences in whole body protein synthesis or indexes of lean body mass in strength athletes consuming either 1,41/kg (0.64g/lb) or 2.42g/kg (1.10g/lb) over a 2 week period. Protein oxidation did increase in the high protein group, indicating a nutrient overload [2].
  • Walberg et al. (1988) found that 1.61g/kg (0.73g/lb) was sufficient to maintain positive nitrogen balance in cutting weightlifters over a 7 day time period [3].
  • Tarnopolsky et al. (1988) found that only 0.81g/kg (0.37g/lb) was required to maintain positive nitrogen balance in elite bodybuilders (over 5 years of experience, possible previous use of androgens) over a 10 day period. 0,99g/kg (0.45g/lb) was sufficient to maintain lean body mass in bodybuilders over a 2 week period. The authors suggested that 1,21g/kg (0.55g/lb) was sufficient for bodybuilders [5].
  • Lemon et al. (1992) found no differences in muscle mass or strength gains in novice bodybuilders consuming either 1,34g/kg (0.61g/lb) or 2,62g/kg (1.19g/lb) over a 4 week period. Based on nitrogen balance data, the authors recommended (0.75g/lb) [4].
  • Hoffman et al. (2006) found no differences in body composition, strength or resting hormonal concentrations in strength athletes consuming either 1,69g/kg (0.77g/lb) or >2,00g/kg (>0.91g/lb) over a 3 month period [1].
Optimal Protein Intake for Bodybuilder

Looking for the optimal protein intake to buil muscle? Aim for 1,80g/kg (0.82g/lb). (Source: Bayesianbodybuilding.com)

Now, there are some old studies based on nitrogen balance that suggest higher protein intakes are beneficial, but, as I stated above, these studies were methodological abominations. Nitrogen balance is a notoriously unreliable method to assess changes in lean body mass, especially at higher amounts, and these studies didn’t control for sweating or dietary adaptation. Significant changes in dietary protein intake are known to result in negative nitrogen balance for up to 2 weeks after the change, even when sufficient energy and protein is consumed. Furthermore, these studies didn’t exclude androgenic-anabolic steroid users though they studied competitive athletes [5]. It’s no wonder many of these studies didn’t get translated and remain no more than a shady abstract on PubMed, if they’re even featured on there.

Based on the sound research, many review papers have concluded 1,80g/kg (0.82g/lb) is the upper limit at which protein intake benefits body composition [6]. This recommendation often includes a double 95% confidence level, meaning they took the highest mean intake at which benefits were still observed and then added two standard deviations to that level to make absolutely sure all possible benefits from additional protein intake are utilized. As such, this is already overdoing it and consuming 2,2g/kg (1g/lb) ‘to be safe’ doesn’t make any sense. 1,80g/kg (0.82g/lb) is already very safe.

The picture below summarizes the literature. As you can see, 1.80g/kg (0.82g/lb) is the point at which additional protein intake ceases to yield any benefits.

But, But, But…!

Muscle Building: How much protein it appropriate

The more muscular you get, the less muscle is built and the less protein synthesis occurs. (Source Flickr / Anton Petukov ; CC Licence)

If you still think you need more than 1,80g/kg (0.82g/lb) because you think you train harder than these test subjects, think again. Lemon et al. (1992) studied bodybuilders training 1.5h per day, 6 days per week and still concluded 1,65g/kg (0.75g/lb) is the highest intake at which body composition benefits could occur [4].

Another frequently heard objection is that people need more protein because they are more experienced than the studied populations. Well, Tarnopolsky et al. (1988) used elite bodybuilders and found that less protein was needed than in novice bodybuilders. In fact, the finding that the more experienced you are, the less protein you need, has been replicated in several studies [7][8][9].

In everyone there is both constant protein synthesis and breakdown. Resistance training causes both breakdown and synthesis to increase, normally with a favorable balance towards synthesis. As you progress in your training, the body becomes more efficient at stopping the breakdown of protein resulting from training. Since less protein now needs to be replenished, this increase in nitrogen retention means less protein is subsequently needed for optimal growth.

Secondly, the more advanced you are, the less protein synthesis increases after training. As you become more muscular and you get closer to your genetic limit, less muscle is built after training. This is very intuitive. The slower you can build muscle, the less protein is needed for optimal growth. It wouldn’t make any sense if the body needed more protein to build less muscle, especially considering that the body becomes more efficient at metabolizing protein.

A final objection that is often heard is that these values may be true during bulking or maintenance periods, but cutting requires more protein to maintain muscle mass. Walberg et al. (1988) studied cutting weightlifters and they still found 1,61g/kg (0.73g/lb) was sufficient to maintain lean body mass [3].

A perhaps even more telling study is by Pikosky et al. in 2008. The researchers took a group of endurance trained subjects and had them consume either 0,90g/kg (0.41g/lb) or 1,80g/kg (0.82 g/lb) of protein per day [12]. They also added a thousand calories worth of training on top of their regular exercise. So these guys were literally running on a 1000 calorie deficit while drastically increasing their training volume. Talk about a catabolic state… Of course the nitrogen balance in the low protein group plummeted. However, the protein intake of 1,80g/kg (0.82 g/lb) in the other group completely protected the subjects from muscle loss. Nitrogen balance, whole-body protein turnover and protein synthesis remained unchanged.

Also, the supposed difference in nitrogen sparing effects of carbs and fat are negligible [13][14]. Neither actually spares protein though. Only protein spares protein. I think the protein sparing idea came from a wrong interpretation of the nitrogen balance literature showing more lean mass is lost in more severe caloric deficits. A simple explanation for that finding is that the more total mass you lose, the more lean mass you lose. No surprises there.

As such, there is simply no empirically substantiated reason to think we need more than 1,80g/kg (0.82g/lb) of protein per day when cutting. If anything, you could reason the body should be able to use more protein during bulking periods, because more muscle is being built and a lot of other nutrients are ingested that may enable more protein to be used.

The only people that may actually need more protein than 1,80g/kg (0.82g/lb) are people with unusually high levels of anabolic hormones. Androgen or growth hormone users definitely fall into this category, but I don’t exclude the possibility that some adolescents do too. If you reach peak testosterone production while still growing (in height), your unusually high levels of growth hormone and testosterone might increase your protein requirements. Or not. There’s no research to support it. Those rare individuals with amazing bodybuilding genetics could also qualify, but unless your father happens to be a silverback gorilla, you are most likely just like other humans in this regard.

The 2,2g/kg Myth’s Origin

Protein Food

Protein rich foods: You need less than you might expect. (Source Wikimedia.org / Smastronardo ; CC Licence)

Why is it then that everybody says you need to consume 2,2g/kg (1g/lb)? Aside from the facts that there don’t need to be any good reasons for why people believe in a myth, that myths tend to perpetuate themselves via conformism and tradition, and that the fitness industry is flooded with myths, here are some plausible grounds for the ‘confusion’.

  • People copy the dietary practices of pro bodybuilders on androgens. Steroids enable you to assimilate far more protein than you’d normally could.
  • People based their recommendations on the flawed nitrogen balance studies back from when the world was still flat.
  • The more is better heuristic. There are so many studies showing protein is good for you, it’s hard not to think more of it is even better.
  • Supplement companies have an obvious financial incentive to make you want to believe you need more protein than you really do. There are actually several industry-sponsored studies showing absolutely miraculous benefits of consuming more protein (see for example the studies by Cribb).
  • People can’t be bothered with decimals and just round up to the nearest convenient integer, which so happens to be an easy to remember. 

On a final note, there’s nothing inherently wrong or unhealthy about consuming more protein than your body can use to build muscle. The excess will simply be used as energy. However, protein sources tend to be expensive compared to other energy sources and variety generally beats monotony with regards to your health, so satiety and food preferences are the only reasons I can think of why somebody would want to overconsume protein.

Take Home Messages

  • There is normally no advantage to consuming more than 1,80g/kg (0.82g/lb) of protein per day to preserve or build muscle. This already includes a very safe mark-up. There hasn’t been any recorded advantage of consuming more than 1,41g/kg (0.64g/lb). The only exceptions to this rule could be individuals with extraordinarily high anabolic hormone levels.
  • Optimal protein intake decreases with training age, because your body becomes more efficient at preventing protein breakdown resulting from training and less protein is needed for the increasingly smaller amount of muscle that is built after each training session. The magnitude of this effect is unclear.

This article in 6 words: Consume 1,80g/kg (0.82g/lb) of protein every day.

Discuss this article on the forums

AesirSports on the web – follow us on our other social media channels, too:

Don’t miss out the latest articles: Subscribe our Newsletter NOW!

Subscribe to our newsletter and get FREE updates about muscle building, fitness, health and nutrition. Enter your email address below and make sure to never miss an article again in the future.

Picture sources: Pixabay.com / Skeeze ; CC Licence

About the Author – Menno Henselmans (Bayesianbodybuilding.com)

Aesir Sports - Menno HenselmansOnline physique coach, fitness model and scientific author, Menno Henselmans helps serious trainees attain their ideal physique using his Bayesian Bodybuilding methods. Follow him on Facebook or Twitter and check out for more free articles.

.

.

.

References (Click to expand)

[1] Hoffman, JR., et al. (2006): Effect of protein intake on strength, body composition and endocrine changes in strength/power athletes. In: J Int Soc Sports Nutr. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2129168/.

[2] Tarnopolsky, MA., et al. (1992): Evaluation of protein requirements for trained strength athletes. In: Journal of Applied Physiology. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1474076.

[3] Walberg, JL., et al. (1988): Macronutrient content of a hypoenergy diet affects nitrogen retention and muscle function in weight lifters. In: Int J Sports Med. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3182156.

[4] Lemon, PW., et al. (1992): Protein requirements and muscle mass/strength changes during intensive training in novice bodybuilders. In: J Appl Physiol. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1400008.

[5] Tarnopolsky, MA., et al. (1988): Influence of protein intake and training status on nitrogen balance and lean body mass. In: J Appl Physiol. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3356636.

[6] Phillips, SM. / Van Loon, LJ. (2011): Dietary protein for athletes: From requirements to optimum adaptation. In: J Sports Sci. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22150425.

[7] Rennie, MJ. / Tipton, KD. (2000): Protein and amino acid metabolism during and after exercise and the effects of nutrition. In: Annu Rev Nutr. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10940342.

[8] Hartman, JW. / Moore, DR. / Phillips, SM. (2006): Resistance training reduces whole-body protein turnover and improves net protein retention in untrained young males. In: Applied Physiology. Nutrition and Metabolism. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17111010.

[9] Moore, DR., et al. (2007): Resistance training reduces fasted- and fed-state leucine turnover and increases dietary nitrogen retention in previously untrained young men. In: Journal of Nutrition. URL: http://jn.nutrition.org/content/137/4/985.full.

[10] Lemon, PW. (1998): Effects of exercise on dietary protein requirements. In: Int J Sport Nutr. URL:   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9841962.

[11] Rozenek, R., et al. (2002): Effects of high-calorie supplements on body composition and muscular strength following resistance training. In: J Sports Med Phys Fitness. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12094125.

[12] Pikosky, MA., et al. (2008): Increased protein maintains nitrogen balance during exercise-induced energy deficit. In: Med Sci Sports Exerc. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18379214.

[13] McCargar, LJ., et al. (1989): Dietary carbohydrate-to-fat ratio: influence on whole-body nitrogen retention, substrate utilization, and hormone response in healthy male subjects. In: Am J Clin Nutr. URL: http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/49/6/1169.abstract.

[14] Millward, DJ. (2004): Macronutrient Intakes as Determinants of Dietary Protein and Amino Acid Adequacy. In: J. Nutr. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15173435.

People who landed on this page, looked for the following search terms: protein intake recommendation, muscle building protein intake, how much protein should you consume, optimal protein intake.


Share this article:

No Comments

No Comments Yet!

You can be first one to write a comment

Leave a comment